Which action can an officer take once illegal items are detected during a frisk?

Get more with Examzify Plus

Remove ads, unlock favorites, save progress, and access premium tools across devices.

FavoritesSave progressAd-free
From $9.99Learn more

Study for the NLETC Arrest Search and Seizure Test. Use flashcards and multiple choice questions, with hints and explanations for each question. Prepare to excel!

When an officer conducts a frisk and detects illegal items, their primary responsibility is to ensure safety and to protect themselves from potential weapons. During a lawful frisk, if an officer discovers an object that feels like it might be a weapon, they are allowed to protect themselves by conducting a limited search.

The correct action is to reach into a pocket if the item is no longer considered a weapon. This means that once the officer verifies that the object is not a weapon—either because it has been clearly identified or through further investigation—they can then retrieve it. This is consistent with the protective purpose of a frisk, which is to ensure immediate safety while not extending to a full search without probable cause.

Other options present different scenarios that do not align with the appropriate legal standards. For example, searching all belongings in the vehicle would constitute a separate action that requires probable cause or consent; simply detecting illegal items during a frisk doesn’t grant that authority. Similarly, demanding the suspect empty their pockets does not adhere to the officer’s limited authority during a frisk and could potentially lead to violations of rights. Confiscating suspected stolen items would also require a different legal basis for seizure, such as probable cause to believe the property is stolen. Thus, only the action of reaching into

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy